Why should misinformation be protected under the Constitution? Don't we need laws to ensure that citizens receive truthful information? If you are living in an authoritarian country, the answer is easy–the state determines what is true and what is false. But in our democracy, the burden for filtering out truth from falsehood falls on each of us. This discussion examines the 1964 case New York Times v. Sullivan that protects newspapers from libel suits, even when they publish "erroneous statements," and its consequences. We’ll consider the reasoning behind the Sullivan ruling, how journalists depend on its protection, and what would happen should it be overturned. Rather than endorsing one side of the argument, can we work together to create animated yet productive public debates?
Ideas on Tap is a series of "pint-sized conversations about big ideas." Join us for drinks, appetizers, and conversation in a casual pub setting.
Cost is $15 per person and includes appetizers and one beverage (beer, wine, or non-alcoholic drink) in the relaxed atmosphere of Feathered Friend Brewing in downtown Concord.
Meg Mott, Ph.D.
The 1960 advertisement in the New York Times that provoked the lawsuit
The 1964 Supreme Court unanimous decision as it appeared in the New York Times
This series was made possible by the Mellon Foundation.
Monday, June 27, 2022 5:30pm
Feathered Friend Brewing231 South Main StreetConcord NH 03301
New Hampshire Humanities
Catherine Winters, Ph.D., email@example.com or call (603) 224-4071.
New Hampshire Humanities programs are made possible in part by a grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH). Any views, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this these programs do not necessarily represent those of the NEH or New Hampshire Humanities.